JFK Case NOT Closed Chapter Previews
Chapters 4,5,6&7
Debunking the Circumstantial Evidence Used by the Warren Commission to Name Lee Oswald as the ‘Lone’ Assassin of JFK!
by Johnny Cairns
Lee Harvey Oswald was not only denied legal representation while in Dallas police custody as the accused ‘lone’ assassin of police officer J.D. Tippit and President Kennedy, two days later, Jack Ruby made sure Oswald would never be a defendant in a public courtroom.
In lieu of a public trial, President Lyndon Johnson assembled the Warren Commission to ascertain the facts surrounding the murders of Tippit and Kennedy, as well as their accused murderer Oswald.
But unlike a public trial, the deceased Oswald was not permitted legal representation before the private Commission hearings. The consequences? Witnesses could not be cross examined. Experts could not be called to refute the physical evidence and exculpatory evidence could not be entered posthumously.
The result was a dominantly circumstantial case against Lee Oswald who was found to be a ‘lone nut’ double murderer who changed history that day in Dallas.
Leading contemporary researcher Johnny Cairns was asked to contribute four chapters to JFK Case ‘NOT’ Closed because his specialty is the physical evidence in this case used to name Oswald as the solitary killer.
The subtitle of JFK Case ‘NOT’ Closed is: Key Evidence Dismissed, Ignored, Altered or Suppressed to Frame Lee Harvey Oswald as the ‘Lone’ Assassin!
That’s exactly what Cairns exposes as he spends four chapters debunking much of the circumstantial evidence against Oswald.
As you read chapters 4,5,6 and 7, imagine yourself as a juror in the State of Texas versus Lee Harvey Oswald, listening to the prosecutors enter into evidence the very physical evidence presented in these chapters as proof of Oswald’s guilt as the ‘lone’ assassin of America’s 35th President.
In these chapters, Johnny Cairns gives Oswald the defense he never received in life or in death as the deceased helpless defendant before the Warren Commission.
The evidence Cairns debates on Oswald’s behalf is as follows:
Chapter 4 – The ‘Lone’ Assassin Rifle
Chapter 5 – The Problematic Paper Bag
Chapter 6 – The Ammunition Linked to Oswald
Chapter 7 – CE 399 (The Magic Bullet)
As a juror, would Johnny’s arguments against the circumstantial evidence establish reasonable doubt in your mind necessary by law to find the defendant, Lee Oswald, not guilty of the crimes of murder on 11/22/63?
